Alfred Russel Wallace
Alfred Russel
Wallace didn’t come from money or education like Charles Darwin yet he lived at
the same time –in the 1800s. Wallace was born in 1823, he left school when he
was 13, but read and read. He was a naturalist with a passion for understanding
how the different species developed. Wikipedia describes him as an naturalist,
explorer, geographer, anthropologist and biologist. Others add that he was a poet and a
spiritualist. He was a humble man.
Charles Darwin |
A bit about Charles Darwin
Admiral Phillip Parker KING |
Darwin left for
South America (esp Patagonia) in 1831 on the HMS Beagle, which was under the
command of Admiral Phillip Parker King (1791 – 1856) [the son of Australia’s 3rd Governor,
Governor Philip Gidley King (1758 – 1808)]. Darwin’s mid-shipman was Admiral King’s son
(also called Philip Gidley King (1817-1904) and Philip Gidley King’s
illustrations were used by Darwin. It was on this voyage that Darwin began to
form his theory of evolution. I write this because Governor King is my 7th
grandfather, Phillip Parker King is my 6th, and Philip Gidley
King is my 5th. It’s the reason my name is Apsara May KING Lindeman!
Alfred Wallace
was born in 1923 so he was younger when Darwin was on the HMS Beagle. Darwin
returned to England in 1840 but didn’t publish anything because he was still
wanting to document everything clearly so he had all the evidence to support
his theory. At the same time, Wallace was exploring, observing, discovering,
documenting and developing his own theories.
Back to Wallace
While Wallace
was still an apprentice, and a building surveyor he loved to spend his time
outdoors and reading books. Books in which he read were novels written by
Darwin of his travels around the world! Wallace became inspired by Darwin’s
travels, especially the Beagle voyage. Darwin was an inspiration to Wallace, and
he managed to save enough money for an expedition of his own to South America. Wallace
went to the Amazon when he was 21yo first and discovered new species, but on
the way back to London his boat caught fire and he lost all his specimens and
notes, four YEARS of his work was destroyed. BUT he didn’t give up, but decided
to start again and he travelled to the Malay Archipelago and Indonesia. He
didn’t have money backing him, so he funded his explorations by collecting
animals and selling them to museums in London, but this time he also collected
for himself.
The Malay archipelago - Wallace's map drawing |
Wallace spent his
days catching and shooting animals to observe in detail. He drew illustrations,
notated them all, he measured and weighed the animals, he even skinned them and
looked at their anatomy. He discovered species that were unlike any others
discovered, and were truly intriguing to him so he wrote in a journal of all
his observations. Mum has been reading Wallace’s book The Malay Archipelago which was printed in 1869. She’s been showing
me relevant sections from the book.
When he was
travelling through the Malay archipelago, he noticed there was a sharp
distinction between the western parts and the eastern parts even though there
was similar climate and terrain as they are both volcanic islands.
Sumatra and
Java were ecologically more like the Asian mainland, while Lombok, Sulawesi and
New Guinea were more like Australia. He especially saw a great contrast between
Bali and Lombok because they were so close. He saw marsupials like the tree kangaroo in Lombok which had only been seen in Australia. He saw the white crest
cockatoo on Lombok.
He wrote a letter from Lombok in 1856, which
said:
“The
islands of Bali and Lombok, though
of nearly the same size, of the same
soil, aspect, elevation and climate, and within sight of each other, differ considerably in their
animals. As an instance, I may mention the cockatoos, a group of birds confined
to Australia and the Moluccas, but quite unknown in Java, Borneo, and Sumatra;
one species (Plyctolophus sulphureus, the lesser sulfur crested cockatoo) is
abundant in Lombok but is unknown in Bali. The island of Lombok appears to form
the extreme western limit of the cockatoos range and that of the whole family.
Many other species illustrate the same fact, and I am preparing a short account
of them for publication”
Wallace noticed
a pattern in the distribution of fauna in the islands. Wallace was the first to
notice there was a biogeographic
boundary across the Lombok Strait and there was a striking difference
between animals of Indo-Malaysia and those from Australasia and that there was
a distinct definition between the two regions. This boundary is now called the Wallace Line.
Wallace thought
it was the depth of the Lombok Strait that kept animals on either side isolated
from one another. When sea levels dropped during the Pleistocene Ice Age, the
islands of Bali, Java and Sumatra were all connected to one another and to
mainland Asia, so they were mostly Asian fauna. The Lombok Strait was very
deep, so the islands (like Lombok, New Guinea, Sulawesi) were colonized by
Australasian fauna.
He wrote:
“the wide
expanse of sea which divides the islands of Java, Sumatra and Borneo from each
other is so shallow that ships can anchor in any part of it since it rarely
exceeds 40 fathoms in depth. And if we go as far as 100 fathoms we shall
include the Philippine islands Bali, east of Java”
He also wrote:
“it is well
known that the natural productions of Australia differ from those of Asia.
Australia in fact stands alone, it possesses no apes or monkeys, no tigers, no
elephant, no horse, no squirrel. Instead of these it has marsupials, only
kangaroos, opossoms, wombats and the duck-billed platypus. In birds it is
almost as peculiar. It has cockatoos, honeysuckers and the brush tongued
lorries which are found nowhere else across the globe. All these striking
peculiarities are found also in those islands”
“The great
contrast between the two divisions of the archipelago is nowhere so abruptly
exhibited as on passing from the island of Bali to that of Lombok where the two
regions are in closest proximity. In Bali we have barbets, fruit thrushes, and
woodpeckers; on passing over to Lombok these are seen no more but we have
abundance of cockatoos, honey suckers and brush turkeys which are equally
unknown in Bali or any island further west”
He also thought
that species survived better in environments because of their genes, and these
would reproduce more so the strong genes survived and adapted to the
environment. The weaker ones died off. It was survival of the fittest. This was
exactly what Darwin had discovered – the theory of evolution through natural
selection.
Wallace sent
his findings, with his observations, hypothesis and evidence, and an essay to
Charles Darwin (who he admired and looked up to) in London to ask his opinion.
When Darwin read Wallace’s theory he realized Wallace had the same one as his,
but Darwin hadn’t published his yet. So Darwin used Wallace’s essay (Wallace
collected over 120,000 specimens) and his own and presented a paper in 1858 –
with both their names. Wallace wasn’t told about it, because he was still in
Asia. In 1859 Darwin published On the
Origin of Species, with just his name, and this is who history remembers.
Very well explained! Seems like Wallace got a bit of a raw deal though - did he forgive Darwin?
ReplyDeleteThanks Prue. Wallace was amazing. He was so humble, Darwin was his hero so seemed pleased to have contributed. But there are lots of people saying he is the forgotten man of evolution. Mum and I watched a really good BBC show about him by Bill Bailey and what was really cool was that Part 1 was Bill Bailey showing what Wallace did in Borneo and he was staying at the same place Mum & I stayed at in the eco-lodge!
ReplyDelete